User talk:JRW

You're removing sourced information, that is called censorship and is not allowed. You're also making major edits without first alerting the community on the discussion page. Please stop.76.27.147.32 (talk) 23:52, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're now in violation of the 3 revert rule [please read it -- MilesAgain (talk) 02:17, 6 December 2007 (UTC)]. I have reported you and you can possibly be blocked from further editing. I'm not sure what your definition of neutral is, but it appears as though you believe that only statments that support your viewpoint are neutral. These references that you continue to delete are stating various organizations' positions on polygraphs. Is it your contention that only the opinion of the American Polygraph Association belongs here?76.27.147.32 (talk)[reply]

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, JRW, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Stifle (talk) 12:28, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Stifle (talk) 12:28, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]