Jump to content

User talk:JTZegers

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
User talk page: This is a Wikipedia user talk page, not an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this page belongs may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:JTZegers.

Welcome to my talk page! Please feel free to bring discussions here from other pages, but please use a diff or quote. Please use diffs when talking about edits. This page is archived by User:ClueBot III. If you leave me a message on my talk page, I will reply on my talk page, so you may want to watch this page. I check my watchlist regularly. I usually add talk pages to my watchlist if I comment on them. Thank you.

October 2024

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Belbury. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Lunchly, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. I'm not seeing that the current sources attribute any of the product's criticism as being "due to" Donaldson's other controversies, it's all mold and child diet ethics. Belbury (talk) 19:36, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I changed it to false advertising and mold since that's what the source says. The controversies were mentioned in a different section. JTZegers (talk) 19:39, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for clarifying. Where are you seeing the false advertising? If that's intended as a summary of "selling crap to kids who don't know better than to trust the people who are selling it to them", I think it's overstating it. Wikipedia should be cautious about making specific allegations which aren't exactly in the sources. Belbury (talk) 19:43, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In one of the sources I found. JTZegers (talk) 19:44, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Which one? I couldn't see anything in the two you cited. Belbury (talk) 19:46, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This one: https://www.thegrocer.co.uk/news/mrbeast-lunchly-kits-for-kids-criticised-by-health-campaigners/695923.article JTZegers (talk) 19:47, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, thanks, you hadn't included that source. I don't see anything in there that would be termed as false advertising, though. Which part of the story are you referring to? Belbury (talk) 19:53, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Where it mentions the irresponsible food claims, then goes into detail over the questionable marketing. I agree, it's very subtle. JTZegers (talk) 19:55, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Wouldn't say either of those was false advertising. Belbury (talk) 19:58, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That's why I changed it to the actual subject of that source. I was just trying to follow the rules here. JTZegers (talk) 20:03, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Okay. Thanks! Belbury (talk) 20:20, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]