User talk:Jackfork/Archives/2020/September
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Jackfork. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
The Bugle: Issue Issue CLXXIII, September 2020
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:52, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
J Delano Ellis Page
He was against homosexual ordination or consecration. The information about O.C. Allen don't need to be on his page. Also, the free mason source and free mason information don't need to be on his page. Sources 22 through 25 don't need to be there either. I am a new testament specialist. I recently communicated with one of his daughters. I know God well enough to know sources 22 through 25 don't need to be there and other things I indicated that don't need to be on his page. Truly, don't need to be there. Ron Wells, MDiv. (talk) 02:17, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
If you don't think it should be there then take it to the talk page for consensus. Learn the rules of Wikipedia. If you continue to remove content as you have you may well be blocked. Jackfork (talk) 02:29, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
- Pardon me for intervening, however, I feel as if I must comment on this issue at hand. Yes, the citations state he was against homosexual ordination or consecration, how the ever it also states while he did not do such a thing, he did indeed certify O.C. Allen as a bishop through the Joint College. Next, the freemason sources are public information and are verified sources, as such they are permitted to be within the contents of the article. If it is verifiable, then it is purposed to remain within the contents of Wikipedia articles. This could lead to allegations (not from me, just for clarification) of a conflict of interest. - TheLionHasSeen (talk) 15:56, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open
Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:05, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced
G'day everyone, voting for the 2020 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2020. Thanks from the outgoing coord team, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:17, 15 September 2020 (UTC)