User talk:JameiLei/Archive 1

Hello, I found confusion in the bizarre statement on your page. It looks like legitimate vandalism. You are not allowed to have personal attacks on your pages. If you want to continue to edit on Wikipedia I strongly recommend that you remove those sentiments from your page. I've seen users blocked for much less. Dfrg.msc 00:24, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lmao, you should have seen my user page before I reverted it, that guy put a template saying I was a sockpuppet of you..I guess you can check the history of my page. The reason he had was 'they have similar contributions'. Apparently, two people who like the same things and are friends is uncommon on wikipedia. <:) Smomo 12:05, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou for removing those words on your page. I placed the Sockpuppet tag on your page because you do look like sock puppets, as a show of good faith I will not re-instate them. I appreciate that you may have similar interest and themes, but to me it looks as two accounts are being managed by one person, as evidenced by, yes, similar contributions and less than 200 edits between the two accounts. Prove me wrong with your editing. Also, I do not enjoy editing other users pages, but I have every right to do so if the action is deemed appropriate in Wikipolicy or concern for the security of the encyclopedia.

By the way, when I first came here, I was accused of sockpupperty too. Dfrg.msc 22:59, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, JameiLei, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Dfrg.msc 22:59, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your AfD nomination of Tottenham Hotspur Food Poisoning Scandal 2005/06

Hi. I came across your nomination of Tottenham Hotspur Food Poisoning Scandal 2005/06 by accident and it was in the wrong place (on the article's talk page). Having just been through the process myself to nominate another page for deletion, I found the step-by-step guide at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion very helpful. The discussion is now at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tottenham Hotspur Food Poisoning Scandal 2005/06 and it's got a couple of votes in favour of deletion already - including mine! Hope this makes sense. Best wishes, Bencherlite 00:04, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Bencherlite 22:20, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An Automated Message from HagermanBot

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! HagermanBot 15:35, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

sign your pages Jamei

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! Smomo 02:31, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE: anon welcome

k thnx. Smomo 20:48, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hurricane Neddy

I see that you recently failed the GAC Hurricane Neddy. On the talk page of the article, you did not state why the article had failed nor changed the template. If you still think the article should be failed, please provide your rationale according to the GA criteria. At this point, I have returned the article back to GAC until you either re-review it again or somebody else does. If you do want to re-review the article, make sure to follow the guidelines at Wikipedia:Good article candidates. Let me know if you have any questions. --Nehrams2020 20:42, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that, some people in the past have gone through and simply failed articles for no reason or just to vandalize. Thanks for reviewing, and please consider continuing to review when you have the time, as we currently have a large backlog. --Nehrams2020 18:25, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Johnny Calling and The Cash

Thanks JameiLei, but I guess Wikipedia is too high and mighty to let people have fun and be amused. You're cool in my book :) --RremundO 23:14, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]