Jump to content

User talk:James K. Workman

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

On edits re Pope Pius XII and the invasion of Poland

[edit]

On my first edit: Pius XII's first encyclical does not condemn the Germans for the invasion of Poland. It only laments the suffering and evils involved.

On my second edit (using the TIME mag.link): Neither the TIME article cited, nor the other one about the encyclical in this issue of the magazine, mention France and Britain. No approval by any of the Allies is mentioned. TIME does comment favorably that the Pope was clear about blame for the war and suffering.James K. Workman (talk) 18:12, 19 August 2012 (UTC)James K. Workman (talk) 18:28, 19 August 2012 (UTC)James K. Workman (talk) 17:24, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am not a watchdog

[edit]

First, I am not a watchdog, and the fact that people are so quick to jump to that accusation the moment someone makes an edit that doesn't present the Church in a negative light. I can't tell you how many times I've been called a watchdog or a "child of the Vatican" or a Jesuit puppet or any number of other things. It's ridiculous. We're not all out to get you or hide facts or any number of other crazy stuff. The Catholic Church article is one of over 200 articles on my watch list. Wikipedia alerts me automatically when an edit is made to any of these articles. I just happened to be online 10 minutes after you made the edit and saw it. It's not a conspiracy.

Second, yes, as I said in the edit summary, there is no real relevance. The article is about what the Church itself is, including others' opinions of it. Quibbles about the NAME of the Church are not relevant to what the Church is. And as I also said in the edit summary, it's an unsourced addition. It needed a citation to be included anyway. If you want to discuss the issue further, try the article talk page.Farsight001 (talk) 19:37, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

[edit]

I notice you are new and wanted to recommend to you that on discussion pages (not the articles) you sign and date your contributions by typing at the end four tildes (~~~~). I have also come across the following information that may be useful to you. I fear it is excessively detailed and so I want to insist, first of all, that going through it is by no means an obligatory exercise!

Welcome to Wikipedia! Listed below are some brief introductions containing all the basics needed to use, comment on, and contribute to Wikipedia.
If you want to know more about a specific subject, Help:Help explains how to navigate the help pages.
  • If you wish to express an opinion or make a comment, Where to ask questions will point you in the correct direction.
  • If you would like to edit an article, the Basic tutorial will show you how, and How to help will give you some ideas for things to edit.
  • If you would like to create a new article, Starting an article will explain how to create a new page, with tips for success and a link to Wikipedia's Article Wizard, which can guide you through the process of submitting a new article to Wikipedia.
  • For more support and some friendly contacts to get you started, the Editors' Welcome page should be your next stop!

I hope this perhaps excessive detail does not scare you off! Esoglou (talk) 07:22, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 19:39, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:James_K._Workman&oldid=544173792"