User talk:Jane Dots

A page you started (Neil Emilfarb) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Neil Emilfarb, Jane Dots!

Wikipedia editor Catmando999 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

This page is neutral and apparently notable.

To reply, leave a comment on Catmando999's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Proposed deletion of Neil Emilfarb

The article Neil Emilfarb has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable. Lacks coverage about him in independent reliable sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. duffbeerforme (talk) 06:49, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Neil Emilfarb for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Neil Emilfarb is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neil Emilfarb until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. duffbeerforme (talk) 10:11, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Repost of Nick VanderLaan

A tag has been placed on Nick VanderLaan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of recreating the page. Thank you. duffbeerforme (talk) 07:29, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]