User talk:Jaspr8

November 2014[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. — Rich wales (no relation to Jimbo) 06:08, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jaspr8 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

this account is not a sock puppet or meat puppet of babanwalia. i do not know anyone by that name(other than having seen that on the talk page where i left a comment).neither have I communicated with him ever. i am a longtime reader of wikipedia. so far i have not contributed much. when i saw an article where i thought information is incorrect, i thought of sharing my opinion. i do stand by my comment. would appreciate an unblock. i look forward to being more active on wikipedia and contribute not just comments but some articles as well Jaspr8 (talk) 20:21, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The timing of the registration and first edit is too coincidental here. I think the suspicion of sockpuppetry or meatpuppetry is quite accurate and will let this block stand. only (talk) 12:40, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notice[edit]

Hello,

It has come to my attention that there is a reasonable possibility that you were made aware of a Request for Comment on the Punjabi language article talk page through an off-Wikipedia email list. Please note that Wikipedia does not allow individuals to selectively notify individuals with the intent of influencing the outcome of a discussion in a particular way. Individuals who receive such emails are encouraged to disregard the contents of the message and leave a message on the individual’s talk page to stop engaging in such activities. Users who are found to engage in further canvassing may be brought to the attention of the administrators’ noticeboard. This may result in sanctions, including revocation of editing privileges. It should be noted that request for comments are closed based upon the merits of the comments presented and whether or not they draw upon Wikipedia policies and utilize reliable, third-party sources to support their statements. The discussion is not a vote, so the closure will not be decided based upon the number of individuals who support a particular side. I hope that this message helps enlighten you on our policies. If you have any questions about these policies, please feel free to reach me on my user talk page. Best regards, Mike V • Talk 20:36, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]