User talk:Javirosa
BJT diagram mistakes
[edit]Good catch on finding the mistakes in the BJT diagrams. I uploaded new versions of the images with fixes. I based this on my old college textbook, and added a citation to that book for the NPN diagram in Bipolar junction transistor. I removed the errata you added since they are no longer needed. I was hoping you would take a look and make sure I didn't create any new mistakes! :) CosineKitty (talk) 19:19, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
- I believe your edits are correct and an improvement. I think some more work could be done in explaining the model as well as using a vector graphic instead of a PNG for the image. It was a good idea to remove the charge carrier indication as it wasn't clear what information those signs were meant to convey. Javirosa (talk) 01:57, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for checking the diagrams. Yes, SVG would be a better file format for these diagrams. I'll put that on my list of things to do that expands five times faster than I can check them off! :) CosineKitty (talk) 20:40, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
- I can make the diagrams if you check them over and submit them. I need to make more edits before I can upload images. I wonder if these talk pages count now that I think about it. :) Javirosa (talk) 08:04, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
- I would be happy to help out. The images reside on the Commons, which uses a separate login. I have no idea what limits are in place... so try it out first and let me know if there are problems. I will keep watching here. CosineKitty (talk) 19:27, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
- I can make the diagrams if you check them over and submit them. I need to make more edits before I can upload images. I wonder if these talk pages count now that I think about it. :) Javirosa (talk) 08:04, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for checking the diagrams. Yes, SVG would be a better file format for these diagrams. I'll put that on my list of things to do that expands five times faster than I can check them off! :) CosineKitty (talk) 20:40, 29 March 2010 (UTC)