User talk:JayKay2022

March 2022

Hello, I'm Serols. I noticed that you made a change to an article, EDF Energy, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Serols (talk) 17:52, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Serols. Can you tell me how you verify your own sources. I assume you consider them reliable and accurate, but can you prove it any more than anybody else? Wikipedia is no longer viewed as a reliable source itself thanks to numerous fraudulent entries which cite so called reliable sources. JayKay2022 (talk) 18:07, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Virgin Group. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Serols (talk) 17:53, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

Hello, again, Serols, if that's who you claim to be. I notice you are unwilling to cite how you verify your own sources. If you think that citing a fraudulent company or published text, which cannot be proven to be legitimate, counts as reliable, no wonder no-one is interested in Wikipedia any more. JayKay2022 (talk) 14:48, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to EDF Energy, you may be blocked from editing. CureComet (talk) 18:10, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

I don't know what you mean by disruptive editing, unless it means that you have a vested interest in publishing a pack of lies. As for your efforts to give the impression that you own or in some other way control Wikipedia, this would explain why no-one takes it seriously any more.

Who are you to tell anyone that their source is not as reliable as a pdf file or a webpage on a site that can be edited by anyone who has access to the host password? Sometimes, a source has not been made public, but is accurate. JayKay2022 (talk) 18:29, 27 March 2022 (UTC)