Hello, I'm SkepticalRaptor. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Extrasensory perception without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SkepticalRaptor (talk) 23:48, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Clairvoyance, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. SkepticalRaptor (talk) 23:50, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with to Extrasensory perception. 00:13, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
I've reverted your recent edits to the pages on Clairvoyance and ESP due to your removal of content from both articles regarding their validity. There is a lack of scientific evidence supporting both, and as such - a section regarding the validity is appropriate. If you wish to take it up to have that section removed, it's your obligation to bring up your point on the article's talk page. Please make no further edits to those sections and do not introduce any bias into the article. Let me know if you have any questions.00:21, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
Responding to comments
I see that you wanted to respond to one of my comments on an article talk page, but didn't know where. If the response is for me personally, you can do that on my user talk page. If it is generally about the article, then respond on the article talk page.
I notice that you are a new editor, and already you have managed to receive several warnings already. You will have a much easier time making yourself at home here on WP if you 1) read up on our policies and guidelines, and adhere to them; 2) avoid making controversial changes to controversial articles until you know the policies inside out; and 3) read article talk pages and observe the behavior of experience editors to learn how we think and communicate on WP. WP is not a free-for-all. You have to be able to justify every edit you make in terms of our policies, and if you make a change that doesn't conform to them, then you end up having it reverted and getting a nasty warning message. This is particularly true for articles on controversial topics,like ESP and clairvoyance.
It's best to get some experience editing non-controversial articles until yopu are very familiar with our policies. The polciies that you should read and know well are : WP:V, WP:RS, WP:NPOV, WP:FRINGE, WP:NOR and WP:NOT. If you continue to make edits that violate these policies, you can be blocked. So get busy, and start reading up on the policies, especially if you want to edit contrversial articles. If you have any questions, you can always ask me on my talk page. Good luck! Dominus Vobisdu (talk) 23:26, 28 October 2012 (UTC)