User talk:Jenny1004jeon/sandbox
Peer Review 1
[edit]Section: Microcredit
[edit]- Your content is neutral and touches on both sides of the argument.
- Perhaps the first line would read better as "Microcredit is small loans without collateral given to people in poverty." — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yp1998 (talk • contribs) 05:17, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
- One thing I noticed was that you mention that the Grameen bank is women centric, perhaps you could expand on how the Grameen bank caters to women. What specific resources do they provide/ what systems do they have in place that support the participation of women in their microcredit programs?
- I really liked that you mentioned how in some cases, microcredit leads to women falling back into the poverty trap. Maybe you could expand a little more on the specific reasons and mechanisms that lead to such cases.
Section: Ongoing Projects
[edit]- I'm surprised that the SDGs weren't already a part of the original article, so I think it's really great that you've included them into the discussion.
- It would be even better if you could include more information about the exact efforts that have been taken under the applicable SDGs.
Section: U.S Involvement
[edit]- I felt that this section could potentially be divided into two parts: one concerned with global efforts taken by the U.S and the other with more domestic ones.
Overall, I think the topics you've chosen are so great and so important as well. Your content is great and I think it will be interesting to see which particular areas you will delve into further.
--Yp1998 (talk) 05:15, 17 March 2018 (UTC)Yalini Prabhakaran