User talk:Jeta

Kostur dialect

Hi, some things for you to familiarize yourself with:

WP:EDITCON: "Wikipedia consensus usually occurs implicitly. An edit has presumed consensus unless it is disputed or reverted. Should another editor revise that edit then the new edit will have presumed consensus unless it meets with disagreement." Therefore, Kostur dialect, prior to your edits, had implicit consensus. You made changes that I reverted, therefore no new consensus has been achieved.
WP:Vandalism: "deliberately intended to obstruct or defeat the project's purpose". You claimed my reversion of your edit was vandalism. Please be careful in attacking other editors.
WP:BRD: a great way to edit on Wikipedia. You made a bold change. I reverted it. Now you should initiate a discussion of why you think your edits should be accepted.

Instead of outright reverting you again, I'm going to WP:Assume good faith and incorporate your sources into the article in a much less POV way. --Local hero ^talk 20:54, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your generosity. I will surely follow your advice to initiate a discussion on this topic. Since obviously the question about the affiliation of the Kostur dialect to Bulgarian or Macedonian is of interest only to Bulgarian and Macedonian linguists, a clarification will be needed on the matter, why Macedonian theory should have an advantage over Bulgarian in the English Wikipedia - against all the neutrality of POV principles. - Jeta (talk) 05:31, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]