User talk:1Muskmelon

Hello, welcome to my talk page!

If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom, as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~

Attention: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—my talk page—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist and topic subscriptions to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.

Thank you!

Your submission at Articles for creation: Willem Valk has been accepted

Willem Valk, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~ Amkgp 💬 14:12, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Piet van Kempen has been accepted

Piet van Kempen, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~ Amkgp 💬 14:37, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Victor Sprenkels has been accepted

Victor Sprenkels, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~ Amkgp 💬 14:30, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, 1Muskmelon

Thank you for creating Victor Sprenkels.

User:Amkgp, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Please add the missing references in 'Life and work' section

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Amkgp}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

~ Amkgp 💬 14:31, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marinus Vreugde has been accepted

Marinus Vreugde, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~ Amkgp 💬 14:40, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Charles Eyck has been accepted

Charles Eyck, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~ Amkgp 💬 14:53, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, 1Muskmelon

Thank you for creating Charles Eyck.

User:Amkgp, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Please add the missing citations in 'Life and work' section

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Amkgp}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

~ Amkgp 💬 14:54, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of tea for you!

For the recent Dutch biographies ~ Amkgp 💬 14:58, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fake sourcing

You seem to simply continue adding sources which have nothing to do with the lines they are supposedly referencing. Here you are replacing a "citation needed" tag for the "Ravensbos" paragraph with this source, which has no information at all about that paragraph. The preceding paragraph also had a CN tag, which you replaced by two references, 1 and 2n which again have no information at all about the text in that paragraph.

You do the same thing here as well, the source here has no information about the text it suppoesly references.

If you continue with these actions, I'll report you at the admin noticeboard, which may lead to a block of your account. Replacing "citation needed" tags with references which have no information about the text preceding it is not helpful at all and actually makes the articles worse. Fram (talk) 08:45, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You can also see the many serious issues with Marinus Vreugd, which was incorrectly accepted and which I moved back to Draft:Marinus Vreugde. See User talk:Amkgp#Draft:Marinus Vreugde for the details. These are issues which I already raised on your talk page for other articles, and which you rapidly archived without apparently taking notice or changing your approach. Fram (talk) 09:03, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fram, As you warrned me befor, so from that day i have not moved any of the article. I have just created draft and submit it for review, even i dont know that the draft created by me are eligible for article space or not. Thanks --1 Muskmelon (talk) 11:03, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have explained to Amkgp that they shouldn't have accepted your draft, but that doesn't take away the responsability from you. You are the one that is responsible for sourcing, indicating that something is a translated article, making sure that you don't use machine translations, ...

Furthermore, while your excuse is about the articles moved from draft to mainspace, it says nothing about the first issues in this section, which are actions you did in exuisting articles in the mainspace, after they had been moved out of draft already. Please discuss your own actions and (more importantly) seriously improve your approach to editing and sourcing, and don't hide behind mistakes others may have made. Fram (talk) 11:08, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fram Ok. 1 Muskmelon (talk) 12:37, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:Appy Pie

I have not commented yet on your habit of creating userpages for other users, which you shouldn't do. But what you certainly shouldn't do is move your pages to userpages for users which don't exist, like you did at User:Appy Pie. Please stop playing games. Fram (talk) 07:57, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]