User talk:Jjdick3978/sandbox

Hello Erhall (talk) 22:02, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like you have a good start. Swpols410 (talk) 19:35, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The articles you have chosen seem relevant to your topic. You have a couple minor grammatical errors and such in the second paragraph. (...that will be reviewed take a look at way the funding...) Trens07 —Preceding undated comment added 18:29, 21 February 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Nice start, consider adding subheadings (=== Topic ===) Jlinehan07 (talk) 19:51, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It looks as though you have sources established and a start on the review of lit. What evidence have you gathered from your resources to guide your research project? As you are developing your review of lit, facts and evidence need to be explicit and sited, so continue moving in this direction as this is a key to a review of lit. Ehall (talk) 04:34, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]