Jump to content

User talk:Jmk

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome

[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Jmk, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Century. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Nsaa (talk) 09:34, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

January 2010

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we must insist that you assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not on Talk:2010s. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ╟─TreasuryTagsheriff─╢ 12:47, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Canvassing

[edit]

Hi, just to let you know that edits like this could be viewed as borderline canvassing; if you could avoid such things in future, or balance them, as per that policy, that would be good. Thanks in advance. ╟─TreasuryTagdraftsman─╢ 20:00, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again! You are being ridiculous. Thank you! --Jmk (talk) 20:13, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You may also need to read WP:CIV. Thanks in advance. ╟─TreasuryTagCaptain-Regent─╢ 20:15, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You may also need to read it. Thanks! And have a nice day! --Jmk (talk) 20:18, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I will be delighted to re-read it, just as soon as you link to an incivil comment that I have made. ╟─TreasuryTagconstabulary─╢ 20:39, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
"Moaning", for example, is not a particularly civil way to call other people's attempts to discuss issues. In fact, your tone in the whole "2010s" discussion has been unnecessarily aggressive, and not a particularly shining example of civility. Of course, you can choose not to see anything incivil in anything you write. That cannot be helped from outside, I'm afraid. Thank you for views, they have been noted. --Jmk (talk) 20:55, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Given that you seem to think, "Hi again! You are being ridiculous. Thank you!" is a comment appropriate to Wikipedia, I am disinclined to treat your comments about my attitude with the gravity I might had they come from someone else! ╟─TreasuryTagCANUKUS─╢ 21:10, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Well, your insinuation that informing one user, in a neutral way, of a discussion that they probably are interested in, might be "borderline canvassing" is, well, quite funny. Perhaps you should spend more time discussing the actual issues and less time trying to invent accusations to put on people's talk pages. --Jmk (talk) 21:17, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hippocamelus photograph

[edit]

I understand that the place where the photograph was taken is in Peru (in the Pampa Galeras National Reserve), or Putre in northern Chile, near the border with Peru, both in full Hippocamelus antisensis distribution, and thousands of miles north of the closest Hippocamelus bisulcus. The arid habitats can be observed, the grayish color of the coat, the slimmer shape of your body, the antlers split from the crown, etc. Hug.CHUCAO (talk) 22:16, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I see. Indeed, the person who took the photo says it was "taken near Putre in Chile" (I did not notice this). Looking at where Putre is makes the bisulcus claim rather surprising! Perhaps you could mention these observations on the talk page of the file (File talk:Huemul.jpg, or even better the Commons talk page commons:File talk:Huemul.jpg)? --Jmk (talk) 23:55, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Muotkavaara (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Finnish, Norwegian, Petsamo and Inari Sami

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 04:04, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:36, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Jmk. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Jmk. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Jmk. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]