Jump to content

User talk:Joneleth

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Joneleth, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  RJFJR 19:01, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

3RR

[edit]

Remember to respect WP:3RR, making four edits in the same 24h period, as you did here can get you blocked. Thanks, yandman 08:22, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV

[edit]

"View"[1] is a perfectly neutral point of view in my opinion. Thanks. ^_^ --ElectricEye (talk) 05:06, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Scientology scriptures and lectures

[edit]

Ok I will find a diferent place to post that info. But you didn't explain your reversal of my prior post. The Scientology page lacks proper citations. I contributed to the page by making a clarification while prividing a full citation. What's wrong with that? If you think my citation is wrong you should provide one, because there is none there.Bravehartbear 02:40, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I did wrong in removing Sci-fi from the name and not mentioning it. I did that because LRH did a lot more work than only Sci-fi; he also wrote westerns, adventure, romance, horror and fantasy; and he also did movie scrips and even TV. But he is better known as a Sci-fi author so that should stay.
About Scientology as a religion we have to differentiate between Scientology the philosophy and Scientology the Cult, Religion or Business. Scientology as a philosophy is clearly a religious philosophy because it addresses: creation, divinity and after life. What people have a problem is with the "Church of Scientology" because it does operate as a corporation. But this is clearly addressed later in that paragraph when it talks about the "Controversial Church of Scientology".
"Communication is the universal solver" LRH Bravehartbear 20:49, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]