User talk:JoshRosenthal2300
Recent edits to Jay Glazer
[edit]
Hello, and thank you for your recent contributions. While the content of your edit may be true, I have removed it because its depth or nature of detail are not consistent with our objectives as an encyclopedia. We recognize that your edit was made in good faith and hope you will familiarize yourself with our policies so we maycollaborate in the future. Thank you! 069952497aComments and complaintsStuff I've done 20:39, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
Re: Jay Glazer
[edit]Continuing your message on my talk page, what do you mean by a "client" of Jay Glazer? Does that mean he is paying you to edit his Wikipedia article? If so, that is clearly against the guidelines of Wikipedia and you must not do so. Sorry for the boldface, but Wikipedia is not a place to advertise, and such incidents of paid promotion are taken very seriously.
As to the edit itself, there are several problems with it. Wikipedia is supposed to be neutral (see policy here), and your edit contains several promotional aspects. For example, your edit states that Jay Glazer is a top insider, and that he has been the first to cover multiple major stories. This depicts Glazer's career in a heavily biased way, and thus does not comply with policy. 069952497aComments and complaintsStuff I've done 20:56, 22 May 2013 (UTC)