User talk:Abominable Fungi

Hello! I am the Abominable Fungi.

Will have page edits coming soon :)

August 2019

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing. Additionally, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for your contributions to Wikipedia, you must disclose who is paying you to edit.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:

Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block. To do so, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason for thinking that the block was an error, and publish the page. Orange Mike | Talk 22:42, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Abominable Fungi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

PsilocybeGuy (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I did not properly research the guidelines to creating wiki pages as in depth as I should've. I work for Joytel, in which this account was created for by my boss. We did not have intentions, nor plans of ambiguous advertising. Joytel has been a company serving the Jacksonville area since 2004 and we figured it was time it had a wiki page to show and detail the history. This is also along with the other 2 companies my boss owns/works for which are GoRACK and JaxNAP which both companies have accounts made for on here. I wish to appeal this ban onto a new account where I can appropriately use Wikipedia and still be able to do so from this IP range as I spend most of my time here. I would also like to seak out further on how to appropriately create wiki pages for my companies. Thank you for your time, I appologize on behalf of myself, and my companies for my misuse.

Decline reason:

If you still intend to create Wikipedia articles about your companies, you clearly still haven't researched Wikipedia's policies. We are not going to allow you to do that here. Yunshui ^雲 _水 16:12, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Abominable Fungi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Abominable Fungi (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

In response to Yunshui's response to my appeal, my intentions aren't to create Wikipedia articles about any of the companies I work for. I have 0 intentions on creating pages on behalf of any companies I work for. I enjoy topics on Wikipedia relating to Fungi and more specifically ones with psychoactive properties. This will be my last unblock/name transfer appeal as I don't want to spam. Thanks again for your time, to whom it may concern.

Accept reason:

Orangemike has been pinged a couple of times below and has not responded with any concerns, so I'm going to go ahead and lift the block. This unblock is made on the understanding that you will no longer make any edits relating to your employer, their companies or their products. Welcome back. Yunshui ^雲 _水 12:14, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

rename

Not sure if the other renamers would agree to PsilocybeGuy due to the perceived drug connection. COuld we try something not connected with drugs?-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 21:57, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hey User:Dlohcierekim, I found a name that would be not in relation to the psilocybe genus. --Abominable Fungi (talk) 01:09, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

globally renamed Joytelnet to Abominable Fungi

unblock discussion

Well, it looks like for starters you agree to not edit about Joytel, GoRACK, and JaxNAP. You've told us what you do intend to edit about. Do you affirm that you and only you will be using this account?-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 02:31, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I affirm the sole use of this account in acknowledgment of your understandings on my agreement not to edit about those pages and only edit/contribute towards the primary topics I relayed earlier. --Abominable Fungi (talk) 02:34, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Yunshui:. @Orangemike: What say ye?-- -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 02:47, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Seems reasonable to me. Yunshui ^雲 _水 07:32, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Orangemike: Pinging just incase you haven't seen this :) --Abominable Fungi (talk) 13:31, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm willing to assume good faith. But we may have a look at those articles on GoRACK and JaxNAP. --Orange Mike | Talk 21:51, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@OrangeMike: Yes, we created 2 other users, goracknet, and jaxnap for what would've been their respective articles. They are of no use, they can be blocked/deleted. --Abominable Fungi (talk) 21:57, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dloh and I have already blocked those two accounts. Technically speaking their existence constitutes an abuse of multiple accounts - which would be a reason to block you in itself - but I'm fairly confident that you're not going to repeat that error, and see no reason for any further sanctions. Yunshui ^雲 _水 22:07, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have been active on many forums over my years and the one thing I picked up was to never multiaccount. Also, I was not the one who created the accounts, it was my boss... which could cause me to fall under the rule of no account sharing, but I've also successfuly claimed this account as my own. Which could be account hijacking, but this is not the case. I enjoy wikipedia and as stated before, I intend to only contribute. Super excited to be here and not kicked out before I can try my hand at it haha. --Abominable Fungi (talk) 22:15, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]