User talk:Kali-K

November 2009

Please do not use talk pages for general discussion of the topic. They are for discussion related to improving the article. They are not to be used as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. NotedGrant Talk 14:24, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we must insist that you assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not on Talk:Kannadiga. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. NotedGrant Talk 14:25, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. NotedGrant Talk 14:55, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to User:Notedgrant. $♠ The Ace of Spades (talk)$ 14:57, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss improvements for that article here or on my talk page.A talkpage is not a forum--NotedGrant Talk 14:58, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Willking1979 (talk) 15:25, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kali-K (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Ok so you block without answering anything about Churchill discussion? Just because I don't care to get admin status ?? I am sure Americans like NRN more than anyone. He has announced more jobs for you right :). English wikipedia on sale. Can't beleive Indians have become much respected in front of Bible reading playboys. Way to go for Wiki Americanization. Obama worrying their kids not able to face tunes of Bengalooreans :)

Decline reason:

I'm not sure what you're saying, but I'm pretty sure it's not a legitimate unblock request. TN X Man 15:42, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kali-K (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Obviously you cannot understand. I just said the admin who blocked was American. If you cannot make sense either you haven't read any talks or discussions or you don't care about being admin

Decline reason:

Abusive unblock requests in fractured english make admins want to reblock you with talk page access removed. Syrthiss (talk) 15:53, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

NowCommons: File:Jaanapada.jpg

File:Jaanapada.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Jaanapada.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Jaanapada.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 05:28, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]