User talk:Kallisti05

Relevance and references at Cherokee (Webserver)

Hi again. While I won't put the relevance of this software in question, please note we need to have external references about it. If the article is sourced only with links from within Project Cherokee, one could expect some bias, don't you think? Thank you for your cooperation, Cvalda (talk) 15:38, 3 December 2010 (UTC) PS: I'm also at es:Usuario:Cvalda en español.[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cherokee (Webserver)

The article Cherokee (Webserver) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable back-office software, effectively unverified, and referenced only to its own websites. No showing that this particular product has had any significant effects on technology, history, or culture.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 17:12, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Cherokee (Webserver) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cherokee (Webserver) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cherokee (Webserver) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:28, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Remember to sign your talk page edits

It seems you forgot to while editing Talk:Norway Talib1101 (talk) 06:02, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tesla NACS

Regarding your edit at Tesla, Inc., it's normal for the technical specs to be part of one document (or series of documents) and for the business aspects to be part of a separate series of documents. Thus, business use, legalities, copyrights, etc tend to be done as business contracts (all of which can differ radically for each customer/user/business) are completely separate from the tech specs. Look to ISO, NIST or DIN standards to see how the technical aspects and the business aspects are kept separated. Stepho talk 00:00, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]