User talk:Katherine hayes/sandbox
Appearance
feedback for the fire class
[edit]- Adding information about the Canoe fire would be fine for a short addition. You should have links to the Ecology section of the article on redwoods, which nicely summarizes the role of fire (with a link to a Ecosphere paper on importance of fire to redwood abundance). Please go ahead and add this..a few sentences would be fine.
- Thanks for looking over the soil carbon article. What is your idea for your main article for the class?
Answer.to.the.rock (talk) 16:51, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
Peer review
[edit]Hi Kate. Here are some brief comments:
- Lead section seems to cover it, though the last sentence doesn't flow with the rest--try to work it into the paragraph, probably near the top.
- Of course add in citations, at the end of each section/subsection even if it carries into the next.
- Under Pyro framework, fire regime types, such as....define or give examples or something brief so I don't have to leave the page (through the hyperlink) to understand it
- Under Fuel Loads, second sentence fragment
- Under methodology, include how the spatial data is used--how it's analyzed--beyond just what the data sources are.
- Under Climate-Wildfire Relationships: first two sentences about satellite imagery doesn't seem to belong here; define NPP in-text (not just with hyperlink); make the connection between NPP and climate explicitly--since that's the section header;
- Under Other Influences--you may just not have added yet, but it seems you'd need more than just deforestation to justify plural use of influences, and subsection title
- It's looking good!
-Justin