User talk:Kelmicster

Tufts "Controversey"

Thank you for your contribution to the Tufts article. In controversial matters, there should be an apparent effort to balance all statements so as to create a neutral tone. See Wikipedia is not a soapbox. Mdiamante (talk) 20:58, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The tone was neutral. Tufts is on FIRE's red alert list. Please do not change the post.

Neutrality involves contrasting views as well as balanced language. WP:SOAP, Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view#Undue_weight Besides, this controversy was already addressed in the article. Mdiamante (talk) 02:47, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I get the idea you don't like what FIRE has said. Nevertheless, (1) it complies with the Wikipedia requirements, (2) it is neutral, and (3) stop deleting it as it will simply be reposted. You are not the sole arbiter of content. Understand?