User talk:Kevings91

Your edits to Dihydrogen monoxide hoax

I don't quite understand your objection here. You seem to be making edits that contradict the very title of the article. It is indeed both a teaching tool and a hoax used to point out scientific ignorance. I'm also not sure why you would claim that calling it hoax has anything to do with liberalism as indicated by this edit summary:[1]. Furthermore, one of the editors you are reverting is not even a person, it is an automated process that fixes links between Wikipedia projects, links that you are apparently intent on breaking. More important than any of that is the fact that you are edit warring and are already in technical violation of the three revert rule. When you find yourself being reverted you need to discuss the matter on the talk page, not just fight over it. Continued edit warring can lead to this account being blocked, and continuing to break valid links will be treated as vandalism since you have now been informed that it is causing a problem rather than solving one. Thanks. Beeblebrox (talk) 23:04, 7 February 2011 (UTC)