User talk:King2k18/sandbox

Article evaluation.[edit]

Article link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suicide_in_the_United_States

Article Title: Suicide in the United States

1) Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?

       Answer: I thought everything in the article was relevant to the article topic. I found my self a bit distracted by the charts and graphs used, they were difficult to follow. Overall I did enjoy reading the article.

2) Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?

       Answer: I believe the article is neutral and does not have a bias toward any one position.

3) Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?

       Answer: I believe the impact of cyberbullying in the LGBTQ community is understated and underrepresented.

4) Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?

       Answer: I check a few citations, and the links work. Yes, the sources do support the claim of the article.

King2k18 (talk) 02:29, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Alexander's peer review[edit]

I read Alexander's evaluation of the article "Suicide in the United States". All in all, I believe he answered the questions perfectly fine. I ended up reading the article as well and I think it was very informative. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mzk224 (talk • contribs) 21:01, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]