User talk:KingKull

John Severin

I'm afraid that despite my entreaties in the edit summaries, you've continued to vandalize the the John Severin article by either removing properly cited information or by adding unsourced claims and other edits contrary to Wikipedia policies and guidelines. I ask you to please stop such edits. If you want to discuss your reasoning at Talk:John Severin, I'd be more than glad to listen. However, if you continue to unilaterally delete properly sourced information, or to add edits contrary to Wikipedia policies and guidelines, I've made four notations to you already under the article's edit summary, and I would have to seek your being blocked from editing. Please do read some of the policies to which I've linked. Thank you. --Tenebrae 05:23, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You added material to a section attributed to a cited source, yet the second sentence you added is not supported by that source. Trying to slip an uncited claim into a properly cited section is dishonest and disreputable. These kinds of actions and your use of a sock puppet show you to be a most dishonorable individual who should come nowhere near an important and high-minded project such as Wikipedia. --Tenebrae 16:29, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Another administrator has blocked the Chiapetrock account indefinitely as a sockpuppet. See Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/KingKull. Please restrict yourself to one account and discuss changes on Talk:John Severin. Wikipedia depends upon open dialog to achieve consensus and make editorial decisions. I have blocked this account for 24 hours. Please discuss this issue on the article talk page and do not edit-war. Thank you.--chaser - t 04:34, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]