User talk:Krako/November 2006

Military brat

Hi Krako,

I completely agree, I would love to include more of a global view on Military Brats... unfortunately, I haven't been able to find any sources for an international perspective. If you have any ideas, I'd love to get them. Other than that, what did you think about the article? It is still somethign that I am working on. Did it flow well? Was it easy to read? Were there things that you liked/did like? Any advice on how to improve the article is greatly appreciated. I'll watch your page for a response.Balloonman 10:11, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, no ideas on how to bring more of an international flavor to the Military brats article. As for your other questions, it is very easy to read, flows very well.

I took the liberty to make some edits here and there. Just little stuff. --Krako^Contribs Talk 16:33, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for taking a look at it and your assistance with editing it... I appreciate every eye I can geton it... Balloonman 16:59, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Krako, I did more research into the actual research on the subject and discovered two interesting facts. First, this is a relatively recent area of systematic studies (only the past 20 years.) Second, most of the research into military brats is funded by the US Armed forces. Thus the bias comes from source materials. I added a new section to the article explaining this bias in research and was wondering if this made you comfortable enough with the article to remove the template? I've even documented this bias as compared to it being my own person perspective!!! I won't remove the template because I'm biased.Balloonman 17:39, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]