User talk:Kristian Levring Madsen

Welcome!

Hello, Kristian Levring Madsen, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as OPUS (research project), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard. Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 14:06, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of OPUS (research project)

The article OPUS (research project) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

It is unclear how this subject meets Wikipedia's notability criteria

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 14:06, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there

I would like help to delete the other OPUS-page I have made. Eventually you can see under "Contributions"

I don't really know what the concerns could be about the OPUS (research project). The project is a University project - without any commercial interests.

Could you be more specific?

Best

Kristian Levring Madsen (talk) 14:14, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Have you reviewed the notability criteria yet? What reliable sources have written about this project, that we could use as sources of information for an article on the subject? Has its work been published in significant academic journals, or has its work been discussed significantly in newspapers and magazines? Most university projects wouldn't be subjects that an international encyclopedia would need articles about, but if this is an unusually significant project, we'll need to show its notability by adding the necessary independent sources. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 14:16, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just checking

By removing the proposed deletion tag, you're saying that you think the article now demonstrates fully that the subject meets the notability criteria. Is that what you meant to do? The tag gives you up to five days to work on the article, but if you're finished, I'd be happy to go ahead and review the article to see if it clearly shows that it meets the criteria, or if it should be sent on for a community discussion of whether it should be deleted. I'll give you a few minutes to put the tag back on, if you removed it accidentally, because I wouldn't want you to be rushed, or to be embarrassed by a discussion you hadn't intended. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 14:22, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of OPUS (research project)

I have nominated OPUS (research project), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OPUS (research project). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 14:31, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

reliable sources

You're very welcome to review the article.

Are artikles like these okay? http://insciences.org/article.php?article_id=3058 http://www.bio-medicine.org/biology-news-1/Enhanced-quality-of-LIFE-through-Nordic-food-7400-1/ http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/dietandfitness/4990538/Nordic-diet-as-healthy-as-Mediterranean-foods.html http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-1162161/Reindeer-meatballs-dinner-Researchers-promote-Nordic-diet-curb-obesity.html

Of course there hasn't been published any results yet since the reseach project runs from 2009 - 2013.Kristian Levring Madsen (talk) 14:34, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]