User talk:Krpelj

After the block, You explicitly 47 times edited (continued disruption) using anonymous accounts. Then You re-make an account, but continue doing bad things, like vandalizing my user page for 19 times ("sucking Vojislav Seselj's dick"), not to mention the numerous other personal attacks.

You're not banned from Wikipedia for a beginner's mistake, but for repeatedly violated the very same rules and doing the very same things after being warned for exactly 23 times. Just like a certain administrator said about You sir, A donkey would've learned by then.

If You have a case around Giovanni Giove (so far I've only seen POV-sided incivility, including mild personal attacks against myself), please show it. Show me his sock-puppets. Give me the links to severe Wikipedia violations. If the reasons are substantiated enough (i.e. he earned a block), his account will be prevented from editing.

Just for the record - I'm not doing this because of anyone (I do not collaborate with trolls), but solely because of Wikipedia's policy. --PaxEquilibrium 15:06, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do not edit articles. The only reason why I haven't reported You yet (and by that I'm not fulfilling my Wikipedian duty) is because You persistently requested to be heard. BTW, You are technically entitled to edit solely User talk:Afrika paprika and nothing else - and I would be glad to continue the discussion over there.

No sir, You are not banned because of a beginners' mistake - such mistakes are forgiven, and were forgiven to You for more than a dozen times. You were banned precisely because of that anger. ANd sock-puppetry.

Yes, I warned him and he threatened me. I again warned him not to delete (proven) warnings, but he just kept deleted them and further threatened me to stay away from him and not be a Crusader of Greater Croatian nationalism. But I immediately abandoned it, because I had to deal with you. Unlike him, You edited articles which I edit too, so I collided with You more often than with him.

Please show me any link whatsoever of the bad edits he's doing. See Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Emir Arven. That's how it's done. Also I will immediately start a check-user if You can find any single violation (turn Your eyes especially to the violations You yourself committed, i.e. editing while blocked).

P.S. Please talk to me in English, or at least provide translations from Serbo-Croat (or Croatian, it doesn't matter how it's called). It is Wikipedia's policy. Thanks. --PaxEquilibrium 12:37, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry

...then I am sorry, I cannot help You. I have given You a chance, and You could've used it to clear at least some dirt from Your reputation (I still think that, taking to granted Your persistence to edit this Internet project, You might one day get unbanned).

This precise incivility is what got You community-banned in the first place. I am very sorry.

P.S. I too am convinced that they are the same person (Giorgio uses the other to reinforce his edits very likely), but I don't have a case before I see anything wrong done (in sock-puppetry's manner). I must see something like casting votes twice on something or editing while blocked (which was the case with You). There is technically nothing wrong in having numerous accounts, as long as You do not misuse them (Wikipedia's policy).

Goodbye. --PaxEquilibrium 16:51, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sock-puppetry

You always point out how You are a victim, who was only innocently forced into doing things (refer to Milo Đukanović); but how do You explain all the trickeries, lies and deceit with Factanista, Tar-Elenion, Zrinski and the others? how do You explain that? --PaxEquilibrium 17:15, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]