User talk:LAcfm

Re:Thanks

You may like to read Wikipedia:Administrators#Becoming an administrator and the rest of the page to learn more. Note that it's necessary to have a substantial amounts of experience, discipline, a good track record to earn your right to be an admin. Mind you, it may not be easy. ╫ ２５ ^{◀RingADing▶} 17:08, 27 March 2007 (UTC) ╫[reply]

Admin status

Most editors like at least four months of editing experience (six is better) with around 3,000 edits (you presently have 5) spread over all areas of Wikipedia.--Anthony.bradbury 22:22, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, around three thousand. Approximate figure. Some admins promote on 2,000; it depends on the nature of the edits.--Anthony.bradbury 07:58, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The essential point is that you need to have, and to show, a good grasp of how wikipedia functions, and the policies to which it adheres. For example, you sent your message to me and dropped it into a conversation on a wholly different topic. Have you seen {{welcome}}? if not, I commend it to you. Left-click on the blue link. It will tell you much of what you need to know.--Anthony.bradbury 17:41, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Help

I would be happy to help. Would you like to give me a clue as to which article you are talking about, and what the problem is? Bear in mind that my current RfA, which if successful will enhance my wiki ability, does not finish for another two days. --Anthony.bradbury 23:08, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Crime Family

its Crime Family all mob familes are known with the Crime Family name right i know im right —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Butterrum (talk • contribs) 15:26, 29 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

why not?--Butterrum 13:54, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This better not be you, Craxy

I swear this better not be Craxy. ♣ Klptyzm ^{Chat wit' me § Contributions} ♣ 02:48, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yeah? Well, it strikes me pretty damn odd that you both know how to and wish to become an administrator when you're oh, so new. ♣ Klptyzm ^{Chat wit' me § Contributions} ♣ 03:13, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that Craxy wants to be an admin so he can get revenge on me. ♣ Klptyzm ^{Chat wit' me § Contributions} ♣ 03:27, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Grand Theft Auto

I have now read the entire dispute, which has been taking place on the talk-page of the article for some long time.

I must confess that I have never played any GFA games, so do not feel competent to decide on gross mattters of article content. What I would say is that much of the dispute appears to relete to fairly trivial points - "family" or "crime family" for example, and much of the rest appears to involve the unwillingness of some editors to accept that, in Wikipedia, no-one owns an article and editing is open to all.

I recognise that this answer is probably not acceptable to you, and I suggest that you go to WP:DR (dispute resolution) for a definitive decision.

Incidentally, I note that you have only been editing under your present name for a very short time. Did you have a previous username, and did you take part in this discussion under it?--Anthony.bradbury 12:25, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have not been blocked from editing; may I suggest that you simply leave the GFA articles alone, and go and do something else? Wikipedia is a big place. I did suggest that you went to WP:DR, which you have not, and I also asked you if you had a previous different username, which you failed to answer. --Anthony.bradbury 22:24, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK; the reason that I ask is that you are being accused of being a sockpuppet of User:Craxy, who left the discussion on GFA shortly before you joined it. It is possible to establish sockpuppet status by inspecting IP addresses if necessary. My advice remains - edit in other articles.--Anthony.bradbury 23:34, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent AIV report

I'd suggest you start a thread at WP:AN/I, actually -- there will be more room for discussion and investigation, and the report will be archived to keep a record of the incident. – Luna Santin (talk) 07:10, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Head to WP:AN/I, and click the "+" icon near the top of the page (next to "edit"). You can read the header text or a few threads, first, to get a feel for things. Easier than it sounds, really. :) – Luna Santin (talk) 07:25, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As an alternative, this link will do the same thing. – Luna Santin (talk) 07:28, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There's a number of "user links" templates you can use -- here's a list. In the end, having a link to particular users is more important than the particular template/method used to link (if it's problematic, somebody can change it, anyway). – Luna Santin (talk) 07:40, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've replaced it for you -- see Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Moved from AIV. – Luna Santin (talk) 19:52, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

3RR

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. Thank you. ♣ Klptyzm ^{Chat wit' me § Contributions} ♣ 03:58, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Klyptzm

I need help! I don't know if your a Admin or not but I just can't take it anymore this user gets me real angery! His username is Klyptzm, he keeps dleating warning tamplets and calling me a sockpuppet! And I know and you know that is a personal attack! He even vandlized my page with a sockpuppet tamplet so I need your help so you or any Admin can take action! And keep this user calm!--Tommy Montana 16:51, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Craxy may not be able to help you soon, for he, too, may be blocked soon. ♣ Klptyzm ^{Chat wit' me § Contributions} ♣ 00:03, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Are you blind? His name clearly reads LAcfm! Not Craxy your the one bugging me Klyptzm! I think you can be blocked! Sorry LAcfm thought you were a Admin can you show me where one is please?--Tommy Montana 04:59, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Personal Attacks

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. I don't know who you are, but leave me alone. Agtaz 21:38, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm surprised this puppet hasn't been blocked yet. Also, its "F.Y.I." not "F.Y.," which reads "for your," which didn't make sense in the sentence you wrote. ♣ Klptyzm ^{Chat wit' me § Contributions} ♣ 22:56, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is unacceptable [1], not in keeping with WP:Civil—Gaff ^ταλκ 23:05, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I see your also mad at Klyptzm! I only just became mad once he kept calling me a puppet! I feel discriminated opon! I think Klyptzm deserves to be attacked and or blocked!--Manny Ribera 10:56, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My talk page vandalism

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for disrupting Wikipedia by making personal attacks. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. Yonatan ^talk 03:25, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thats a lie!! I was set up!! It was Sean Mc Sean! LAcfm 03:38, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I never set you up... Sean mc Sean 03:57, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes you did white boy! LAcfm 03:59, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes Sean Mc Sean did. I watched your every move Sean Mc Sean! I noticed that you have gone on from hateing Klyptzm and needed edvice to avoid him and I gave you some! But after I did and I asked you for your Myspace account link you started to act weird, and Vandlized my page!--Manny Ribera 14:48, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I never Vandalised your Page Manny... I just thought that you may be Craxy... But i guess you aren't, here http://www.myspace.com/bill_lancaster. Sean mc Sean 02:20, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. I bet you feel cool changing my words around. ♣ Klptyzm ^{Chat wit' me § Contributions} ♣ 21:16, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That your attack some some IP address when you was BishopTutu. If I found out about that earlier, I would reported your ass, and you'll be blocked with me laughing. LAcfm 21:31, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Go ahead and report me for something that happened almost a year ago. I was subsequently warned for that attack, too, so there's really nothing you can do about it. ♣ Klptyzm ^{Chat wit' me § Contributions} ♣ 23:09, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You'll have your final days soon! You don't know me that well! LAcfm 23:35, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I highly doubt that, sir. ♣ Klptyzm ^{Chat wit' me § Contributions} ♣ 01:13, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FY! You MFF, boy!

Please do not attack other editors. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ♣ Klptyzm ^{Chat wit' me § Contributions} ♣ 02:16, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Using the same ass warning line! I worked my finger to the bone for the video game articles, and you come along and starting messing shit up! LAcfm 02:41, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NPA

You have been blocked from editing for 3 7 days in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated personal attacks. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Other users in the meantime are advised not to make baiting comments on your talk page. I'm quite serious about that; anyone who's reading this, think twice and walk away instead of leaving a nasty comment here. ··coel acan 04:50, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've also protected the page for the length of the block due to use of this talk page by the blocked user to continue his personal attacks.--Jersey Devil 05:00, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Opps, I unprotected it by mistake. Luckily coelacan has now protected it for the length of the block.--Jersey Devil 05:01, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]