User talk:LPCA/FAGS

previous contested deletion

it should not be deleted because it's a term used in economics

it's related to other such terms:

if PIGS/PIIGS and BRIC/BRICS is allowed, then FAGS should be also.

search the media please.

further more, i don't see how some one involved in the medicine industry is qualified to decide if this page about economics is vandalism or not. i know i am not qualified, as i am a programmer, and i have poor knowledge of economics, but i do know this...

LPCA (talk) 22:44, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, see WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS. Second, there are no references for such an acronym. Third, there is no category for it at Commons as suggested by this page. As for my qualifications-spare me. jsfouche ☽☾Talk 22:45, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

jsfouche ☽☾Talk 22:45, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

well then, providing a reference:

http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message1506913/pg1

it's poor, but i'm pretty sure if some one tries hard to find more, they will find...

http://www.google.pt/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ie=UTF-8&ion=1&nord=1#sclient=psy&hl=pt-PT&safe=off&nord=1&site=webhp&source=hp&q=France+Austria+Germany+Sweden+FAGS&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.&fp=a7e981b7b9c5e9be&ion=1&biw=1152&bih=696

i can't help more because i'm not into economics that much, but i've seen this term being used multiple times. just an hour ago someone used the term again on a chat, and when i searched for it, to read a bit more, i was disappointed it had been deleted on wikipedia. that's why i recreated the page, with the poor knowledge i have.

see Wikipedia:EFFORT and Wikipedia:ABOUTEVERYTHING and Censorship...

LPCA (talk) 23:10, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]