User talk:Laponnel
The previous version of this WIKI is factually wrong. I corrected the facts .......
I am Thomas Dam´s grandson so I know the history - there are MANY factual errors in this WIKI. We just started.
Notice of possible conflict of interest (COI)
[edit] Hello, Laponnel. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Troll doll, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:
- avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
- instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
- when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
- avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
- exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).
Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 15:06, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
May 2016
[edit] Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Troll doll, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 14:48, 18 May 2016 (UTC)