Please do not add inappropriate images to Wikipedia, as you did to Mike Jeffries (CEO); it is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. :) John Cline (talk) 22:49, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of The Empty Throne
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on The Empty Throne requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. ®amos 17:01, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
Royal Artillery Precedence
Hi - I understand the point that you are making but it is not borne out by the citations you have given given: none of them include the qualification "and no regiment of the Household Cavalry has its colours on parade". The previous wording, which is supported by the "Daily Mail" citation and the "British Army units 1945 on" citation really should remain until you can find a citation that supports your qualification. In the meantime please can you restore the properly cited information until the discussion is properly concluded. Best wishes. Dormskirk (talk) 21:16, 23 April 2014 (UTC)