User talk:Lars.elkhorn

Neutrality

Wikipedia is not a place to advocate for or against any individual. As your only edits have been to Craig Huey, with information that was not public knowledge beforehand, such as his birthdate, I want to remind you of that fact, and that we will be watching the article to make sure it is neutral, verifiable and is fact, rather than opinion based.--A Second Man in Motion (talk) 05:11, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

I agree with your comments and would like to add that Lars has chosen to continue to revert reliably sourced material with basically no reasons given, and has added a large amount of unsourced puffery that does not comply with WP:RS. KeptSouth (talk) 13:30, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

Hijacked

I respect Wikipedia's guidelines and will honor them. However, attention needs to be paid to another contributor(s) who is (are) posting inaccurate and undocumented information, much of it advocacy for a political opponent. Lars.elkhorn (talk) 16:19, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

Hi Lars, I am glad to hear that you respect Wikipedia's guidelines; that makes it all the easier to say that you should review them before continuing to remove material that is reliably sourced from the Craig Huey article. It also seems you have not responded to A Second Man in Motion's comments above, but instead chose to counter-attack. I don't see where the article on the opponent, Janice Hahn has a lot of uncited material - in fact it has progressed from being largely unsourced, to having a reference at the end of nearly every sentence. Please respond to the above remarks, and on the talk page to the afor the Craig Huey article for continuing concerns and discussion. --Regards--KeptSouth (talk) 13:29, 14 June 2011 (UTC)