User talk:Ldevin2

Speedy deletion of Bill2phone

A tag has been placed on Bill2phone, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 13:42, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

I've taken another look at it and see that you might be right. Except, it actually contains very little information on the company itself; only the service they provide. That is part of what makes it seem like advertising; if it's a generic service, then no need to focus on only this company, and if we're focusing on only this company, give more than a marketing push. Another comment: way, way too much formatting; less spans, fonts, etc. We don't need nor want those here. Also, re-evaluate the external links - An aimless link to NANPA adds nothing to the article and just confuses people looking for more information; perhaps there is a specific page on the NANPA site you're wanting to link to? That said, I will undelete it if you promise to make these changes. --Golbez (talk) 16:06, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Ldevin2 (talk) 13:56, 21 May 2008 (UTC) Thanks for relooking at this. You are correct that it goes into almost nothing about the company itself and that was intentional. The market push or advertising would occur if you did actually promote the company over any other company. The company is a clearinghouse like the others noted in the article. Therefore it was my attempt not to promote one company over another. The article is about a service that is generally available to merchants.

I will absolutely try to make those changes. The formatting doesn't seem to appear in the article and those in the tags were generated by Microsoft. I don't know that much about these things <g>, but I'll give it a collegiate try. I'll look at the NANPA site to get more specific.

Do I need to put the hangon tag on?

Ldevin2 (talk) 14:34, 21 May 2008 (UTC) I made all the formatting changes. Removed the one Nanpa reference as it had a more specific reference below that. And I hope the removal of the all BSG reference except the one that would be required to identify the service and those of others helps.

I've restored the talk page. Cheers. --MZMcBride (talk) 21:22, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of User:Ldevin2/Sandbox

A tag has been placed on User:Ldevin2/Sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Alexius08 (talk) 04:07, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Bill2phone

I have nominated Bill2phone, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bill2phone. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Alexius08 (talk) 04:09, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Nomination of Bill2phone for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bill2phone is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bill2phone (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rathfelder (talk) 13:19, 16 September 2019 (UTC)