User talk:Le melfitaine

April 2023

Hello, I'm 3knolls. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Ofanto, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 3knolls (talk) 11:25, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have only restored the already existing information, which is present in all the encyclopedias of the world in English, German, French, American, and many university studies. However this encyclopedia had the correct data before your edits. We just need to restore how it was two, three, four, a hundred days ago! Le melfitaine (talk) 12:20, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't be a vandal Le melfitaine (talk) 12:33, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please carefully read Wikipedia:Verifiability: Wikipedia is not a source. You cannot remove sourced content.--3knolls (talk) 12:36, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You must look for raw data and independent elaborations, not secondary sources and repetition; you have to look for university studies, studies from the regions of Puglia, Basilicata, Campania, information from the databases of English and American geographers, data from the Ministry of Education and finally what is under discussion in the Senate of the Italian Republic Le melfitaine (talk) 12:40, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.--3knolls (talk) 12:54, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

First provide the source here (or directly in the page), but don't remove sourced content please.--3knolls (talk) 12:54, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

bravo Le melfitaine (talk) 12:59, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]