User talk:Lenni lenape

How the "F" do I get a straight, clear and concise answer out of this 'pedia???? I submitted an article, and I don't care if it's not likeable. I just want know what happened to it. I have tried every page available within the parameters available, all I get is more "intellectualising" of Wikipedia greatness.

But, no instructions to a page like: 'Type your Q here and one of our staff or experienced Wiki member will help you.'

Even if I ask a simple question like, where did my article go? I get a freak'in page that asks anybody if they want to edit my Q ??? I registered; and some pages say I'm here, others say "no information results for this search."

This question is very clear: Who or where do I go to ask a simple question and get a clear and simple answer? "F off" is clear and simple, I'll settle for that.

But, do not PR this site as welcome if it is not!

Even as I write this, some marks and querks get on my message that I didn't put there. I have to go back and take them out. How does a person know if the people who "think" they are "editors" get the proper information if the site injects what it wants, away from a control of the author?

Your, Could Be, Good Member Bud (Lennilenape) Whiteye

note: I edited as I wrote so I have nothing to put into the "edit summary" box. You may, without objection from me, kick me out if that is a violation of some kind - I did not see any instructions in that regard in this instruction-heavy site.

moving stub template

For some reason you moved Template:NorthAm-native-stub to Aamjiwnaang: A Canadian Community Under Siege. I have moved it back. That template is a stub template being used by more than 200 articles in Category:Indigenous peoples of North America stubs, which were all messed up by that move. --Ezeu 14:28, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your Message to Stormbay

Hi there! I just noticed your note to me on my user page. ( I seldom go there myself so missed it foe awhile). I moved it, intact, to my discussion page. Regarding my comment on the article in question; it seemed to me that it could be merged. I know I also could be wrong. There is no doubt that the material needs a voice. I will leave any other judgements to others. Cheers! Stormbay 21:48, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]