User talk:Leobuild
Speedy deletion of Leopardo Construction
[edit]
A tag has been placed on Leopardo Construction, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD g11.
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Acroterion (talk) 21:24, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
I see you've been rewriting the Leopardo Construction article, and it's taking a less promotional tone. It still has some distance to go - you should think in terms of encyclopedias, and what you encounter there. Just the facts, nothing else. Take a look at Turner Construction or Kiewit Corporation. At this point, the big issue is notability - what independent, third-party coverage (from multiple sources, preferably) exists that makes your company notable. The Turner article is pretty well-referenced, the Kiewit article isn't, and needs improvement. I would suggest that to be considered notable, you'd need to be in the top 25 or 50 of the ENR list, or to have completed multiple projects of national stature. It is generally considered to be a conflict of interest for someone to write an article on one's self or for one's own company (which is in itself grounds for speedy deletion), so all salesmanship should be removed, and you should be content with a simple article, should the article survive notability review. Acroterion (talk) 22:48, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
Image:Leologo.jpg listed for deletion
[edit]An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Leologo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 21:04, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
