User talk:Libeyellow96

September 2019[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Rick and Morty (season 4), you may be blocked from editing. Radiphus (talk) 16:04, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, ma'am! Libeyellow96 (talk) 16:04, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 16:04, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Libeyellow96 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am sorry for vandalizing Wikipedia. I am also sorry for calling Radiphus a nerd. May you please give me another chance? I promise I will use my account for editing articles about villages in Warwickshire, never for vandalism.

Accept reason:

Fine, I'll go out on a limb here and accept your unblock request and give you a second chance... Please don't make me regret that decision. Just contribute positively to the project and follow Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and you won't run into any problems. ;-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 16:11, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OMG, thank you very much, Oshwah! Libeyellow96 (talk) 16:13, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Oshwah: The Warwickshire reference above by the vandal is hinting to them being a sockpuppet of Cls14 who has been creating trouble for me for the last two days (see ANI report here). Radiphus (talk) 16:14, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Radiphus - Thank you for the information. I'm looking into this now... ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 16:31, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Oshwah: This vandal has been prolific for several days on many different articles, using different names and ip addresses. See for example:

Special:Contributions/2600:8805:8880:2EE:FCB8:9E6F:9257:F075
Special:Contributions/2600:8805:8880:2EE:29D3:765C:75AC:2B9C
Special:Contributions/2600:8805:8880:469:B03B:A4B5:E439:6838
Special:Contributions/2600:8805:8880:469:34DC:C0EA:920A:A872
Special:Contributions/2600:8805:8880:469:B03B:A4B5:E439:6838
Special:Contributions/72.192.37.102
Special:Contributions/2600:8805:8880:2EE:C64:2E12:9B19:29E0
Special:Contributions/2600:8805:8880:469:805D:63D8:1E7F:EE9E

Captainllama (talk) 18:12, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 17:51, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]