User talk:Lifeweaver

Welcome!

Hello, Lifeweaver, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! JFW | T@lk 13:49, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Talmud

On Talmud you added come-and-hear.com as a site containing the Soncino Talmud. If you read Carol Valentine's opinions you rapidly see that she is a rabid anti-Semite. We have long ago decided that the site should not be linked from Talmud. JFW | T@lk 13:49, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Spiritism on Major Religious Groups page

Stop editing the part that says that Spiritism is Christian. Spiritism is Christian and dont change it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Daniel4sw (talk • contribs) 00:03, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ok, then spiritism should be taken out completely since its that diverse. And Christian Spiritists are included there, and it doesnt make any sence to do that since CHristianity is included there. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Daniel4sw (talk • contribs) 02:08, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability

I think you should stop tagging articles for notability. You have gone way too far with this tag. I stumbled upon your tagging in the Combat Arms article. Really, there can be no doubt that this game is plenty notable for a Wikipedia article. While the article may not establish this as well as it it could it doesn't mean that there is any sensible reason to question the notability. You can put a references tag there, and when references have been fixed the notability will be crystal clear as well. EBusiness (talk) 14:04, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Wikipedians who like NationStates

Hey! Based on your edits to NationStates, I thought maybe you would be interested that I started a series of userboxes for the game. Feel free to add any or add your own!-🐦Do☭torWho42 (⭐) 05:52, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I went to the article and Edits by user showed nothing, so I deleted above. But then the following came: - Lifeweaver (talk) 17:02, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There's this for what it's worth?-🐦Do☭torWho42 (⭐) 09:05, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you are right. I revived what you wrote earlier. Sorry. I need to be more careful. - Lifeweaver (talk) 17:02, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Lifeweaver. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]