User talk:Lipkan.vladim

Welcome!

Hello, Lipkan.vladim, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! —C.Fred (talk) 12:33, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please be careful with original research

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to NATIONAL SECURITY PARADIGM, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 12:33, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Biogeonergydeterminism method for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Biogeonergydeterminism method is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Biogeonergydeterminism method until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Psychonaut (talk) 14:09, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Natsecurology for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Natsecurology is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natsecurology until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Psychonaut (talk) 14:11, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of NATIONAL SECURITY PARADIGM for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article NATIONAL SECURITY PARADIGM is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NATIONAL SECURITY PARADIGM until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Psychonaut (talk) 14:16, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lipkan.vladim. You have new messages at C.Fred's talk page.
Message added 14:32, 28 May 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Nomination of National security hermeneutics for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article National security hermeneutics is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National security hermeneutics until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Psychonaut (talk) 16:23, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your articles

Hello, Lipkan.vladim. I notice that you've been creating a large number of articles on your own research and theories. Could I ask you to please stop creating these and instead follow the advice given to you by User:C.Fred? Wikipedia does not accept articles on topics which have not been the subject of extensive coverage by independent, third-party sources. Unless you can demonstrate that your own research has received such treatment, and make sure this is clearly indicated in the articles, they will be deleted. —Psychonaut (talk) 16:26, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 17:33, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Problem identified with your source

You have marked my source 'Lipkan Vladimir, Natsecurology, European University Published, 2003' as 'Term not used in the source' or. But this termin is used there, but in original language(ukrainian).

The tag after the reference goes with it, so that source has been marked as original research, since you wrote it. —C.Fred (talk) 17:38, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lipkan.vladim. You have new messages at C.Fred's talk page.
Message added 22:22, 28 May 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]