This is an archive of past discussions about User:LoreMariano. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Even if it were, it would not excuse you calling views you disagree with "filthy". But it is factual, not inflammatory, and was in the article for years. There's no excuse for the lede not to reflect the article's content. - Outerlimits (talk) 04:07, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
You can't cherry pick from the article the derogatory information you want to appear in the lead. Hopefully the final lead will reflect a summary of what is in the whole article, not just the points you want to make in the way you want to make them. LoreMariano (talk) 04:15, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
Well, it certainly should start reflecting the article content, and now, not some remote time in the future. If you think there is something missing from the lede, you add it in, you don't delete summaries of content just because you don't like it. You've had months to make this right; you haven't, so now it falls to others to do. - Outerlimits (talk) 04:19, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions about User:LoreMariano. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
