Jump to content

User talk:Louay55

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Louay55, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~~~~, which will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

laurap414 (talk) 16:56, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your name has been mentioned at the Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard

[edit]

Hello Louay55. You are welcome to join the discussion and add your own comments there. It is a particular concern that you seem to have removed well-sourced critical information from an article that appears to be about yourself. Our biographical articles should reasonably reflect the persons' actual reputation, as learned from reliable sources. 03:59, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

I have restored the reference to the page after providing the larger context. The question of whether the insertion of this reference is fair is still standing. the label is supposed to be used by porsecutors in the court of law. The US Court of Appeal of the Fifth Circuit ruled, Untied States vs. Briggs (1975) that "no legitimate governmental interest is served by an official public smear of an individual when that individual has not been provided a forum in which to vindicate his rights." [1]The Fifth Circuit introduced in 1981 more measures to protection the integrity of individuals who have no recourse to challenge their designation as unindicted co-conspirator by ordering that court filings and other records that carry their names be sealed and struck from the record. [2]EdPage (talk) 06:09, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  1. ^ FEDERAL COURTS LAW REVIEW - 2004 Fed. Cts. L. Rev. 1 [1]
  2. ^ FEDERAL COURTS LAW REVIEW - 2004 Fed. Cts. L. Rev. 1 [2]