User talk:LoveWikis

Welcome!

Welcome...

Hello, LoveWikis, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Marek.69 ^talk 19:58, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Autodata Solutions

I have restored the article to a user subpage for you, User:LoveWikis/Autodata, that way you can work on it without the interference of talk page comments. Cheers, James086^{Talk | Email} 14:58, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article looks good. I agree that it wasn't blatant advertising, however there was no claim of notability before, which is the other reason it was deleted. Now, with references, it is clear that it shouldn't be deleted. I think it's fine to put it in the mainspace now. Just click the "move" button at the top and put the new title "Autodata Solutions" in the box. Feel free to ask if you have any questions. James086^{Talk | Email} 06:14, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CarsDirect

A tag has been placed on CarsDirect, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of CarsDirect and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Cheers Kyle1278 05:29, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

OK sorry about that it was my mistake.--Cheers Kyle1278 18:14, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for violating our guidelines on promotional and conflicted editing. Guy (Help!) 12:10, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of CarsDirect

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is CarsDirect. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CarsDirect. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:04, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of DoItYourself.com

A tag has been placed on DoItYourself.com requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Chocolate4921 10:03, 9 May 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chocolate4921 (talk • contribs)

Nomination of DoItYourself.com for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article DoItYourself.com is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DoItYourself.com until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Izno (talk) 14:07, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of FitDay for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article FitDay is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FitDay until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 08:55, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Apartment Ratings for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Apartment Ratings is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apartment Ratings until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 21:29, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]