User talk:Luther Hull

Yo I'm Luther_Hull, this be my talk page.

WrestleMania XXV

WWE uses both names. Since that is a controversial move, you should make a move request per WP:RM and set up a discussion. TJ Spyke 18:06, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2009

This is your only warning.
The next time you move a page maliciously, as you did to WikiScanner, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -MBK₀₀₄ 18:33, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Posting fake warnings such as this is just as bad as maliciously moving pages. Stop this behavior immediately or your editing privileges will be revoked for good. This is not a place to joke around and have fun, we are here to build an encyclopedia. -MBK₀₀₄ 18:50, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for malicious page moves, fake warnings, personal attacks and other behavior that indicates that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. -MBK₀₀₄ 19:04, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Luther Hull (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Personal attacks? Where? The others I will regrettably admit to, but I see no personal attacks.

Decline reason:

Here's one. but if you're admitting to malicious page moves, fake warnings and other behavior then, well, don't let the door, etc. — ➨ ❝ЯEDVERS❞ a reasonably good buy 19:11, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

To admin review: I have placed this block up for discussion on ANI: Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Block_review_requested -MBK₀₀₄ 19:08, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Luther Hull (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The "malicious" page move was a tester that I didn't expect to actually move. My bad. The Barnstar was a light-hearted joke, not a personal attack, and as it was on a talk page I see no harm to Wikipedia. Furthermore, I'd like to add that after reading the admin discussion I'm quite heart that I'm seen as only having "two good faith" edits, I've made numerous contributions to discussion on articles. Anyway, as the Barnstar was misconstrued can we not all just make up and get along? As a Wrestling fan I feel I can help a lot on the road to WrestleMania.

Decline reason:

The ANI discussion indicates that, no, we can't. — Sandstein 19:27, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Luther Hull (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Why are you being so uptight? This admin seems to think you are [1]

Decline reason:

Apparently here for disruption which includes malicious page moves, personal attacks and vandalism per contribs and ANI discussion and above all, not here to contribute productively.Goodbye.— Sandahl (talk) 20:20, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Luther Hull (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

"Apparently" yes, "Actually" no, I think you'll find one test edit that went wrong (How else are you supposed to test? Out of interest) and then a mock barnstar on someone's talk page, which he obviously didn't get. I honestly don't think that warrants a permanent ban.

Decline reason:

None of this has addressed your complete history of vandalism. Goodbye. — ➨ ❝ЯEDVERS❞ a reasonably good buy 20:36, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

For abusing the unblock request, your ability to edit your talk page has been revoked. To request further unblocks, you can e-mail them to this address: unblock-en-l@lists.wikimedia.org -MBK₀₀₄ 20:45, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]