From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Name of student reviewer |
Wikipedia User:Joselv83
|
Date of review |
5/9/2013
|
Name of editor |
Wikipedia User: M.Caban
|
URL of editor’s Userpage |
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:M.Caban
|
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page |
05/9/13
|
Date review submitted to instructor |
05/9/13
|
Length of edit (too long/too short) |
Good length
|
Image (needed/appropriate) |
N/A
|
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) |
Accurate
|
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed |
N/A
|
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) |
Accurate to I/O Psych
|
Wikiformatting |
Good Formatting.
|
Grammar & composition |
I think you may need to add the 's after "consist" where you wrote: "Herzberg theory consist..." Other than that, everything is good!
|
Other comments |
Good Job!
|
Joselv83 (talk) 03:58, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Name of student reviewer |
Wikipedia User:CRamel16
|
Date of review |
05/06/2013
|
Name of editor**Replace with username for version on talk page** |
Wikipedia User:M.Caban
|
URL of editor’s Userpage |
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:M.Caban/Edit_Wikipedia_Work_design
|
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page |
05/07/13
|
Date review submitted to instructor |
05/07/13
|
Length of edit (too long/too short) |
Perfect length
|
Image (needed/appropriate) |
no image
|
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) |
The information is relevant.
|
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed |
yes
|
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) |
yes
|
Wikiformatting |
used bullet points.
|
Grammar & composition |
Good Work
|
Other comments |
use external links for extra credits
CRamel16 (talk) 23:39, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
|
Name of student reviewer |
Wikipedia User:Nikicia
|
Date of review |
May 7, 2013
|
Name of editor**Replace with username for version on talk page** |
Wikipedia User:M.Caban
|
URL of editor’s Userpage |
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:M.Caban/Edit_Wikipedia_Work_design
|
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page |
May 7, 2013
|
Date review submitted to instructor |
May 7, 2013
|
Length of edit (too long/too short) |
Length is appropriate
|
Image (needed/appropriate) |
Not needed
|
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) |
Accurate information
|
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed |
yes
|
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) |
Article is accurate and relevant to I/O Psychology
|
Wikiformatting |
bullets used
|
Grammar & composition |
Good
|
Other comments |
Nikicia (talk) 08:14, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
|
Name of student reviewer **Replace with username for version on talk page** |
Wikipedia User:Xyzbb1253
|
Date of review |
5/7/13
|
Name of editor**Replace with username for version on talk page** |
Wikipedia User:M.Caban
|
URL of editor’s Userpage |
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:M.Caban/Edit_Wikipedia_Work_design
|
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page |
5/7/13
|
Date review submitted to instructor |
5/7/13
|
Length of edit (too long/too short) |
Meets the requirement
|
Image (needed/appropriate) |
N/A
|
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) |
Information was sourced from the textbook
|
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed |
N/A
|
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) |
Information is related to I/O Psychology
|
Wikiformatting |
Neutral point of view, bullets and number are aligned
|
Grammar & composition |
Grammar is good, numbering and bullets are fine
|
Other comments |
None
|
Reviewer's Signature |
Xyzbb1253 (talk) 09:00, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
|
Name of student reviewer Trinirebel
|
Date of review |
5/7/13
|
Name of editor**Replace with username for version on talk page** |
Wikipedia User:M.Caban
|
URL of editor’s Userpage |
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:M.Caban/Edit_Wikipedia_Work_design
|
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page |
5/7/13
|
Date review submitted to instructor |
5/7/13
|
Length of edit (too long/too short) |
Appropriate length
|
Image (needed/appropriate) |
None applicable for this edit
|
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) |
Information was sourced from the textbook
|
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed |
N/A
|
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) |
Information is related to I/O Psychology
|
Wikiformatting |
bullets and number are aligned, exemplary formatting
|
Grammar & composition |
Error free
|
Other comments |
Note worthy edit!
|
Reviewer's Signature |
Trinirebel (talk) 03:11, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
|