User talk:MDVANCCSA

Welcome!

Hello, MDVANCCSA, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to Dixie does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Klaun (talk) 20:42, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I am new to wikipedia editing. With neutrality in mind should this edit be undone too? If we're dealing with facts, the revision prior is the more neutral of the revisions to that paragraph. But, since I'm still learning the rules of wikipedia I'm not looking to step on others toes. (MDVANCCSA (talk) 22:07, 6 January 2018 (UTC))[reply]

Hi, MDVANCCSA I don't see a reason to undue that edit. I think it improves the section per WP:AWW. Note, you might find it useful to use the Template:Reply to to get other editors attention. Also using indenting with the ":" punctuation can help make conversations on Talk pages more readable. Each additional ":" indents one level further. Take care. --Klaun (talk) 22:13, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]