User talk:MGMT90018 2015S2 Psychological Contract/sandbox

Simple Past Tense Hi, guys. I am proposing we use simple past tense if you are in doubt. Because we refer to existing research and not to our opinion, simple past tense considerably might be more appropriate.

Editing Introduction I also edit some parts in Introduction, because I think two sentences in paragraph one expressed the same notions.

739954MGMT (talk) 17:03, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have changed some into past tense--729462MGMT (talk) 03:45, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Editing the Grammar

My dear group mates, I will do some editing some grammar on the group page. And the structure looks really good!--729462MGMT (talk) 02:54, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, alva. Would you like to comment on Structure section? Thank you. 739954MGMT (talk) 04:16, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Alva and Will739959MGMT (talk) 05:18, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Structure

Hi, guys. I think I will change its structure later on. I have difficulties in writing the development of psychological contract, because it overlaps with the formation of psychological contract and employee-employer relationship develops. I will make a new subheading and incorporate those subjects, so what do you think? 739954MGMT (talk) 04:14, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi guys, I almost finished my part about the application. However, the journals mostly talk about the breach in each country, hence my writing is also about the breach in each are (for instance, Vietnam, China and Hongkong, I grouped it as Asia).739959MGMT (talk) 05:17, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

yup, its fine for me. the more we supervise other's work, the better the structure will be.740184MGMT (talk) 10:58, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

we still need to put some pictures and looked for overlapping references

hi guys, I recall Adam was advising us to post pictures to our sandbox. it will enhance our mark and aesthetic.740184MGMT (talk) 10:56, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. I have tried and I cannot figure it out. Perhaps someone can help me then? thanks. 739954MGMT (talk) 13:10, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference

Hi, guys. Please complete your journal references with the volume and number of the journal. I see there are some citations with the same reference and the reference is written twice. I delete one reference for Rousseau (2001) in the formation of the contract. cheers. 739954MGMT (talk) 13:15, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reasons for deleting the original Wikipedia paragraphs

The deletion of original Wikipedia paragraphs has the following reasons: firstly,our new parts would be overlapped with the content with the original ones and it can avoid some confusion to the readers;

secondly, it can avoid the higher similarities;

thirdly, our contributions will be more clear and understood. --729462MGMT (talk) 00:54, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

okay, thats clearer now. but I count that our words only reach around 4100 words, is that okay? Adam told us that is okay to include original work for our assignment and wont drag down our plagiarities — Preceding unsigned comment added by 740184MGMT (talk • contribs) 01:22, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The word count is around 4000-6000, right? I think it's better to go along with Alva's suggestion, because it will make our contribution clearer and reducing the similarities. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 739959MGMT (talk • contribs) 06:45, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The advantage to deleting the original Wikipedia article is we can trace our contributions, therefore we can provide solid arguments of what we have written. The disadvantage is the word count only 4,000 words, perhaps there are some good points in original Wikipedia article we miss. 739954MGMT (talk) 06:56, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]