User talk:MaCRoEco

The following map incorrectly shows Alaska a separate color from the rest of the US http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Public_debt_percent_gdp_world_map.PNG

You're right. It has been corrected. MaCRoEco (talk) 20:32, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Erreur

Je ne suis pas un menteur. J'ai essayé plusieurs fois d'utiliser la procedure "The work of someone else, who has given permission to use it on Wikipedia or it is a work released under a free license" sur cette page. Mais ca ne marche pas. Le seul moyen pour moi était d'utiliser la procedure classique. Bien sur, j'avais ensuite l'intention de rajouter "deritative work from Image:Structure of the taxation in France in 2007.png by Macroeco", mais comme je trasfere plusieurs fichiers, je n'ai pas eu le temps. Toutes mes excuses.--Pah777 (talk) 20:50, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ca y est, j'ai rajouté ce qu'il faut. En fait c'est en utilisant Commons que tout foire. J'aurais pu utiliser sur la WP anglaise la bonne procedure, je vais d'ailleurs changer le tag. ET ce n'est pas moi qui ait ecrit "I created this work entirely by myself", c'est un processus automatique, mon intention n'etait pas de pretendre etre l'auteur du graphe. --Pah777 (talk) 20:55, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Par contre, en anglais, taxation signifie prelevement obligatoires. Les anglophones ne font pas de distinction entre cotisations sociales et impots. Ils appellent les cotisation payroll tax. Du coup, les cotisations sont font partie des impots. Par ailleurs, le niveau de PO en France a peu changé de 2005 a 2007, donc le graphe reste vrai (de plus, le graphe est approximatif). Ce qui me perturbe sur le graphe en francais, c'est "autres", que j'ai cru bon de remplacer par "social contributions", cad les cotisations sociales. J'ai pourtant des doutes. Etait-ce une bonne idée ? --Pah777 (talk) 21:24, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dans l'article Taxation, dans la boite a gauche, la payroll tax est incluse dans les taxes. J'avais laissé un message ici pour demander confirmation, mais il me semble bien que pour les anglo-saxons, les cotisations sont des taxes et que PO equivaut a taxation. Et par aailleurs, ne dit-on pas que les cotisations donnent lieu a des contreparties, a la difference des impots ? Parceque les contributeurs beneficient tous de la protection sociale (redistribution horizontale, logique bismarkienne), alors que les contribuables ne recoivent rien (redistribution verticale, systeme beveridgien). Quand a ton graphe, je veux bien admettre qu'il est precis, mais je ne vois toujours pas a quoi correspond "autre". Peut-etre s'agit-il de recettes non fiscales de l'Etat. Toujours est-il que ce graphe est tres bien fait (c'est bien pour ca que j'ai pris la peine de le traduire). J'en ai traduits un autre aussi, Expenditure and revenues, France, 1993-2006.png. Jusrtement, je voudrais savoir avec quel logiciel tu les fais ? --Pah777 (talk) 22:58, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Il y a différents types de cotisations sociales (voir l'article PO), certaines rentrent dans les PO et pas d'autres. Le concept de PO n'existe pas aux USA.

"autres" : j'ai déjà répondu, c'est tous les autres "petits" impôts et "petites" taxes du document dont je t'ai donné le lien.

logiciel : Office 2007. MaCRoEco (talk) 14:04, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Western Europe map.svg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Western Europe map.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. (talk) 22:44, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Economics census

Hello there. Sorry to bother you, but you are (titularly at least) a member of WP:WikiProject Economics, as defined by this category. If you don't know me, I'm a Wikipedia administrator, but an unqualified economist. I enjoy writing about economics, but I'm not very good at it, which is why I would like to support in any way I can the strong body of economists here on Wikipedia. I'm only bothering you because you are probably one of them. Together, I'd like us to establish the future direction of WikiProject Economics, but first, we need to know who we've got to help.

Whatever your area of expertise or level of qualification, if you're interested in helping with the WikiProject (even if only as part of a larger commitment to this wonderful online encyclopedia of ours), would you mind adding your signature to this page? It only takes a second. Thank you.

Message delivered on behalf of User:Jarry1250 by LivingBot.

Your image file upload is now featured

An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status

Your image, File:PowerStation2.svg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! I'ḏ ♥One 20:08, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replaced. --I'ḏ ♥One 20:09, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

POTD notification

Hi MaCRoEco,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:PowerStation2.svg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on August 22, 2014. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2014-08-22. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:42, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Orphaned non-free image File:Ensae.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ensae.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]