User talk:Majkluss

November 2023

Hello, I'm Annh07. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Prusa Research, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Annh07 (talk) 14:53, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Prusa Research. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Annh07 (talk) 11:19, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Annh07 :), I understand, I am sorry, if I violated anything. I've tried to use just facts (not to write that "Prusa's printers are the best" and so, but just to clarify what Prusa made (with the awards and the record mentioned), I think this is ok from my side. But if not, what should I edit? I've used other Wiki pages as a source "how to write something". Thanks a lot in advance. Majkluss (talk) 12:06, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

- The article needs multiple published sources that are: in-depth, reliable, secondary, strictly independent of the subject.

- Sources from the company's website are primary sources, they are not used to verify notability.

- Wikipedia is not a reliable source so you cannot use other Wikipedia articles as sources.

- Also the content in the article is promotional, please read WP:SPAM.

In summary, there is no indication that this topic qualifies for an article, please read WP:ORG and WP:GNG. Thank you. Annh07 (talk) 14:05, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Annh07, thank you for all the information. I'll try to update the page to Wikipedia's terms. Thank you very much in advance. Majkluss (talk) 09:39, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Prusa Research, you may be blocked from editing. Annh07 (talk) 14:41, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Majkluss. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Prusa Research, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Annh07 (talk) 11:20, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]