User talk:Marky1981/Archive/2007

A request for assistance

Would you support the concept of moving the Earhart "myths" to a separate page or article? The reason for my suggesting this is that the main article should be an accurate and scholarly work while the speculation and conspiracy theories surrounding the disappearance of Amelia Earhart are interesting, they belong in a unique section. Most researchers, as you know, discount the many theories and speculation that has arisen in the years following her last flight. Go onto the Earhart discussion page and register your vote/comments...and a Happy New Year to you as well. Bzuk 05:02 3 January 2007 (UTC).

Mud Maid - apology

Image:mudmaid.jpg I do apologise. - I've just been working on this image for an album cover, and was looking up the sculptors' names, which brought me to the Wikipedia page on Heligan. The attached jpg is also cropped, but we must have photographed on the same day and pretty much at the same moment. The lighting is the same, and the position of the leaves in the foreground, only the angle is slightly different. Sorry, again. John Gibbens 15:51, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Joel Houston

Your edit was nicely done. I moved the family section to emphasise the patrimony Albatross2147 03:03, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit was very nicely done. I'd been wondering what to do with that article - but you've done a great job reformatting it. Teebs101 12:33, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're probably right about it looking like a fan page (of sorts), Mark. Personally I sometimes find it hard to write articles/make edits that are in perspective and not over-the-top. I listen to a fair bit of Christian music, and it can be difficult giving a fair and accurate representation of your favourite (or least favourite) artists... Teebs101 22:23, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Forever (Hillsong album).jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Forever (Hillsong album).jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:36, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]